KingCast v. Friends of Kelly Ayotte emails 20 Dec 2010 

Yah so they are going to try to move to strike any references I made to potential conflicts of interests and substantial contacts. Trying to whitewash the History Books, not the first time I've seen it. Careful guys, wait until you see what I put in the record in my Reply Memorandum. -The KingCaster.

Christopher King to Brian, jack.middleton, gmacdonald, jennifer.parent, bcc: lionnews00, bcc: ralph, bcc: Arthur, bcc: Jeanne, bcc: Jonathan, bcc: awolfe, bcc: mbrindley, bcc: pmeighan, bcc: Mike, bcc: michael, bcc: India show details 4:51 PM (54 minutes ago) Counselors: I have no intentions of removing any links for several reasons: 1. The links to cases online need not be removed, the cases are what the cases are. If an online link fails to work 50 years from now the case is still in the Federal Reporters. I attached unreported cases as required by convention in any legal pleading. 2. The links to YouTube videos will always come back to that video. I would be willing to refile these documents with embedded videos, however, as YouTube could conceivably not be around for 50 or 100 or 200 years so you have a point there, I would appreciate your written assent by tomorrow to embed the videos and waive objection to page limit changes as it may run 26 pages after that process. 3. My legal team and I look forward to receipt of your Rule 11 warning letter, and exactly how it is you intend to seek Attorney Fees on my Memoranda in Opposition, and to have me scolded for asking about the substantial contacts between McLane, Graf and Judge McCafferty. 4. Don't leave Jack out of this email chain again. He is a Counselor of Record. As I say, I didn't fall off the turnip truck yesterday, or any other day for that matter. All I wanted to do was ask a few questions, and I offered to settle. You guys wanted the fight, you're going to get the fight. Very Truly Yours, Christopher King, J.D. http://KingCast.net -- Reel News for Real People 617.543.8085m