51 - 60
results out of
http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2010/06/kingcast-presents-neighbors.html 29 June 2010 KingCast presents: Neighbors! Soooo.....(Coming by 1:30p) Press Release link and Verdict Link at wepapers.com. So here you have three sets of neighbors, one set still tight as Gorilla Glue after 37 years. Another still tight after 5 years. And one set that witnesses acts so severe as to warrant a $1.6M verdict for Civil Rights and property claims in Scott Hyman/Julie & Don Prescott v. Hemlock Association of Lakeville, MA. This blog post will be the repository of blog posts that one may access through a blog search for "Scott Hyman," but here is the Chief Post, and another solid early post. Here is the verdict post: Civil Rights: Scott Hyman $850K Don Prescott $300K Julie Prescott $300K Nuisance: SH $100K DP $75K JP $75K Trespass: SH $500 Adverse Possession awarded to Don Prescott; Prejudgement Interest computed at 1% per month since July, 2006. It will be a few days before my exclusive final video and interview with Mr. Hyman is online. Don't worry, it's gonna be good. Real good. Remember what a buoy is, it's a "Dead fucking thing that floats in the water." KingCast short films One, Two, Three. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkB699GtTxk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsHTfH0CoW0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrvfgtx-X7U PS: Remember the Dan Talbot police murder trial coverage? Well that's coming back around soon, wait for it. Man that case was totally slim shady. KingCast: Reel news for real people.
, On November 20, 2010
A How to Guide about Installing Satellite TV on your PC.
Prezentare generala sistem de securitate
Citibank finally produced the video that shows they, along with their lawyers, were lying about key elements of a Civil Rights case, surprise, surprise. Read more at.....http://citibankisracist.blogspot.com/.......http://citibankblog.blogspot.com.....http://samshaulson.blogspot.com......http://kingcast.net
O prezentare a modului de functionare al sistemelor de supraveghere video . Exista o serie de criterii ce trebuie luate in seama pentru a alege un sistem de supraveghere video de calitate, in functie de necesitati. http://www.supraveghere.ro/
III. Authentication and the posture of this case: It is still a Motion to Dismiss.
.............Defendants fecklessly cite: Carmona v. Toledo, 215 F.3d 124, 131 (1st Cir. 2000) “To be admissible at the summary judgment stage, documents must be authenticated by and attached to an affidavit that meets the requirements of Rule 56(e).”
.......In case the Defendants need a reminder, we are not arguing a Summary Judgment motion, although at this point the Defendants are getting the benefit of substantial discovery against Plaintiff while their removal and Motion to Dismiss has removed his opportunity to obtain one whit of discovery.
...........Now Defendants seek to invalidate the use of any video materials the relevant portions of which are clearly authenticated because it is obvious that Plaintiff was rolling the video . At the hearing for Disclosure Plaintiff will then properly swear Under Oath that any and all campaign event video and stills were taken by him, that he has been in exclusive custody of same, and that the video has not been digitally altered. Once again, it is a Motion to Dismiss at this point, but Plaintiff does certainly look forward to the Summary Judgment phase at which point he will move for it pursuant to NAACP v. Thompson, 648 F.Supp. 195 D.Md.,(1986).
A Decision that reads just like a carbon copy of Respondent's pleadings, with no consideration of the Respondent's lies and of the physical facts documented by video and pictures.