By  Krystal Marshall, University of Phoenix, Arizona, On September 3, 2010
Proof here I was living in a different county then the issuance of orders---its called lackof venue jurisdiction. Also Probate Court in New Hampshire did not have subject matter jurisdiction to begin with. So it is in the wrong court altogether period!
Views: 15
Main Category: Family Law
Tags:
By  Krystal Marshall, University of Phoenix, Arizona, On September 3, 2010
This is true certificate not the other two. Notice this one only apponted the wife. Even though the court should not have appointed ANYONE in this case. This is the true record. Also note a JUDGE signed this not a deputy clerk like the other certificate. The other blank certificate is VOID without a signature.
Views: 15
Main Category: Family Law
Tags:
By  Krystal Marshall, University of Phoenix, Arizona, On September 3, 2010
This is how someone can allegedly gain custody of a child not their own? Just claim the mother is homeless and took her from school and is emotionally unstable without evidence? Also this petition badly drafted proves Robert Nilram was not a co-guardian like the certificate claims.
Views: 11
Main Category: Prelaw Studies
Tags:
By  Krystal Marshall, University of Phoenix, Arizona, On September 1, 2010
How did Robert Nilram end up here and why is this document signed 10 Years later? Remember the petition only has Dawn Nilram on it. Peggy Kraft is also living in AZ.
Views: 17
Main Category: Trusts and Equity
Tags:
By  Krystal Marshall, University of Phoenix, Arizona, On September 1, 2010
What is wrong here? This document was used in the state of CA. Notice the document has NO SEAL or SIGNATURE?!!
Views: 14
Main Category: Trusts and Equity
Tags:
By  Krystal Marshall, University of Phoenix, Arizona, On September 1, 2010
What is wrong with the Petition? No docket number on the petition. Different addresses for the father No proof of proper jurisdiction of venue. Aradia lives in a PO Box and different address than that of the alleged guardian here? No parental consent in the consent section. No judiciary ever signed this petition. Petition is supposed to be temporary. This makes the entire case VOID ab initio as a matter of law which vitiates EVERYTHING!
Views: 15
Main Category: Trusts and Equity
Tags:
By  maya raz, College of Management, Israel, On January 5, 2009
Views: 274
Main Category: Trusts and Equity
Tags:
By  Bar tender, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, On September 8, 2008
Views: 2394
Main Category: Trusts and Equity
Tags: Common Equity law