Free Essays on Warrant to Get Inspired & Learn by Example

Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of Law

Introduction
Policing in the United States of America has changed its approach towards fighting crime constantly. It has been evolving by adopting new procedures like Community Policing and Problem Oriented Policing backed by routine activities theory. Although the crime rates have reduced in the past decade, this period hasn’t been without controversies. The ethical behavior of police personnel has been given the spotlight longer than the effectiveness of the police in preventing crime.
Ultimately, the actions of individual police officers will also be used to judge their supervisors. Moreover, the intensity of these infringements has been on the Continue reading...

Constitution

Memorandum
Re: DC v. Blake
Based on the memo about the details of the DC v. Blake case, this return memo is to offer an opinion about some of the case’s key decisions.

Issue

It is important to establish the facts of the case. The main focus here will be on the arrest and ensued after.
A disgruntled neighbor (apparently disgruntled) called the police about too much noise at the residence of Jessie Smith and his wife.
The officers responded to the call. But rather than get to the house immediately, they took their turn watching the goings on Continue reading...

In the case of United States v Warshak, the government argues that the ex part seizure of Warsak’s private emails did not violate the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizure by contending that they relied to the provision of the Stored Communication Act that allows the government authorities to compel a service provider to disclose the electronic communications of their users under compelling circumstances. The government invoked the doctrine of reliance in good faith where the exclusionary clause provided in the Fourth Amendment will exculpate the government authorities from liabilities (Clancy, 2011). Thus, they justified their act Continue reading...

Introduction

The Paris Hilton Carls Jr Burger Ad has created a significant amount of controversy. Advertising is the method by which companies reach their consumers in hopes of increasing sales. The type of advertising used is dependent upon the target market and their interest. Creating a vision for what a product is and how it can help the consumer in some capacity. It shows how a product could be used and, in essence, how it would make their life easier. Advertising is intended to increase sales and overall company profitability. Companies spend millions of dollars yearly in efforts to reach Continue reading...

In the case of Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332, the Supreme Court upholds the suppression of plastic bag containing cocaine that was obtained from the vehicle of the accused as evidence, holding that it constitutes a violation of the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable search and seizure. The Constitutional provision under the Fourth Amendment requires that a valid warrant from the court must be secured when conducting arrests and searches. The conduct of search and seizures without going through a judicial process of securing a warrant that determines the probable cause of doing so is considered to be unreasonable Continue reading...

Article Reviews

Police Investigations of the Use of Deadly Force Can Influence Perceptions and Outcomes
The article, written by Shannon Bohrer and Robert Chaney attempts to examine officer’s involvement in cases where use of deadly force is present. Misconceptions about use of deadly force are mentioned, as are preconceived notions and suggestions concerning when an officer is directly involved in the use of deadly force, i.e. has been shot, or has fired a gun. The investigative process is also assessed in an effort to understand if one situation should be handled differently than any other.
According to the article, a Continue reading...

What is a detainer warrant? Who is likely to be served with detainer warrants?

A detainer warrant is a warrant issued against an inmate who has a pending charge in another location. For example, a criminal has been imprisoned in another jurisdiction and has finished his sentence already, he will be released to the other custodial authority where he has committed another crime. People who are likely to be served a detainer warrant are serial killers and other criminals who move from one place to another.
2. Why do you think that there are gang problems in the prisons and jails? What strategies do prison officials use to combat their prison gang problems?
Continue reading...

The US Constitution provides some legal principles that will regulate the conduct of the police authorities with respect to the manner of obtaining evidence through search and seizure. Called the exclusionary rule, this doctrine prevents the police authorities from illegally searching and seizing evidence against an accused. An example of this is conducting a search without a valid warrant. The consequences of doing so will constitute to the inadmissibility of the evidence obtained against the accused before the court as a result of a “fruit of a poisonous tree.” The concept of this statement pertains to the illegally obtained Continue reading...

Criminal procedures in America are essentially put in place in order to prevent discrimination when it comes to the application of criminal laws. They aim at ensuring proper treatment of suspected criminals according them their constitutional rights. The procedures give a guideline of the process from arrest to ultimate appeal in the courts. Understanding of these procedures mainly comes from the interpretation of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments
The Fourth amendment is concerned with the right to being free from unreasonable search and ultimate arrest. According to this amendment, “The right of the people to be secure in Continue reading...

Riley v California

Summary
The question before the court was whether police would need a specific warrant to search the digital data from say a phone of an arrested person. In this particular case, Mr. Riley was arrested and the police had access to his smartphone in which they (read police) retrieved information connecting the arrested person to a previous shooting. The defendant, Mr. Riley, argued that the information retrieved from his smartphone was contrary to his privacy rights under the Fourth Amendment. In essence, his argument was that the court must disregard the information derived holding that the search had violated Continue reading...