Blindness Insight And Madness Essay Example
“Blindness Insight and Madness” in the plays are demonstrated by the authors in the play through various reactions of the characters towards their problems or troubles. Modern Psychology sought to explain this situation as something that exemplify inflexibility, and in such a manner that roots a positive level of pain in someone's emotional and social life, they meet conditions for a personality illness. Some may be more unwary and explicitly unbecomingly mad, while others may be categorized more obviously by the sense of desolation, fears of rejection, suicidal emotional state, and more delicate changes in their involvement of others, from venerating others to more silently feeling degrading or disdainful of them. Emotions incline to be strong and swiftly ever-changing and this notion may cause for relationships be disposed to be at odds; there may be thoughtless, self-damaging or self-defeating actions; and there is a deficiency of a strong and intelligible sense of identity in the part of the person going through such a difficult time. This paper is a discussion about the different concepts that brought the characters in the play conducting a blind insight and madness in confronting their troubles.
Clytemnestra hated Agamemnon not just for killing or sacrificing their daughter Iphigenia. She also suspected that her husband and the priestess Cassandra are committing adultery and so they should be punished. There are a lot of unsettling manifestations of Clytemnestra’s character in the story. She had these complicated thoughts and reactions in her every involvement. She seemed to suffer some psychotic disorder that is undefined but vividly illustrated in the play through different reactions and thoughts revealed in the play. Her suspicion on Agamemnon and Cassandra is somehow questionable as she is also identified to have been involved in an adulterous affair with her husband worst enemy, Aegisthus. Her tragic death in the hands of her son Orestes would also generate doubts and questions among the audiences. Clytemnestra claimed she murdered Agamemnon to avenge their daughter’s death but her death was also a form of revenge for his husband’s death. In any terrible event in someone’s life, it will definitely create uncertainties in terms of struggling for doing the right or appropriate actions. Emotions can be greatly influential to someone experiencing pain or suffering on losing someone dear. It may even cause far more damaging extents to the person and some would also experience trauma. An undesirable ordeal can be traumatic to any person who experienced it first-hand. Numerous studies and researches have been conducted to explain or find solution this disorder. It has a temporary effect on some people but unfortunately some would manifests in their whole lifetime. Some of these manifestations are demonstrated by the whole works of drama in literature, political science, or psychology. One cannot actually claim that persons who manifest this kind of state in a disgraceful or unacceptable condition. Authors in plays apparently did a lot of efforts to explain or describe this kind of conditions through different characters. It will display some elucidation on why one particular character is driven to perform a terrible act that seemed blind or unreasonable in terms of the ethical standards of the society. These unreasonable acts are highlighted to pose emphasis on the things that should be paid attention to.
On the other hand, Orestes’ quest for revenge presented another matter. The blood of Clytemnestra brought Furies to haunt and curse hi of which drives him mad. He was bent on getting justice for his father’s death. The idea of vengeance appeared to be repeated which continued itself. Clytemnestra and Aegisthus killed Agamemnon for justice and vengeance. Aegisthus bore hatred for Agamemnon as he thought that his own father received ill-treatment for his brother Agamemnon. Clytemnestra plotted for Agamemnon’s death as a revenge for the death of her daughter. Then the children of Agamemnon and Clytemnestra also avenged their father’s death. The sequence of revenge and killings has clearly continued. It only ended when the trouble was carried before Athena’s court of justice and there resolved irreversibly. Discerning, judging, and acting appropriately is uprightness and virtue. Having recognized the connection between justice the virtue and fairness the social morality, directs the audience to the connection to the concepts and theme of Aeschylus’ well-known plays. The author, writing from the viewpoint of a playwright, exemplified the distinction between justice and vengeance with the determination of instituting that the former idea is greater to the latter. The concept of justice is greater to vengeance because it offers individuals with that matter for which they are pursuing as when they hunt vengeance deprived of forming a sequence that propagates itself. It confines and encloses unlawful activity. This notion is one of the fundamental variances between the social order and cruelty. Conversely, vengeance and the deficiency of having control with the emotions that accompany the intense desire for vengeance obviously uncovered a form of disorder in the thoughts of the characters. The trouble with vengeance is that it is not self-regulating the manner justice is. The principles of justice offer a boundary on the recompense that can be required from an individual who has offended somebody. An individual in search of vengeance is not so restricted and is possible to claim and take excessively much from the individual he is retaliating himself on. This situation will even foster more retaliation from the person, or his relatives as a result. The viciousness worsens and cannot be controlled. This condition impends the continued existence of society itself. The right judgment in civil and criminal circumstances is the impartiality people suppose the laws and rule to offer people.
Understanding how feelings, sentiments and thoughts influence actions is significant for individuals who have strong emotions and are frequently ruled by them. This notion is prominently exemplified by the characters such as Agamemnon, Clytemnestra, Aegisthus, Orestes and even Elektra. Consciousness about emotions and the considerations that reinforce or moderate those emotions can aid individuals progress means to improve or cope with their whereabouts. Researchers and philosophers consider that revenge is a method of instituting justice and that the danger of vengeance may work as a form of defense, a kind of application of social collaboration. It could be that the determination of revenge is in avoiding certain aggressive movements or the danger of vengeance protects individuals to not experience trouble in the future. But at times, people turn vindictive and unforgiving when no better outcomes can come of their whereabouts, other than to perpetrate misery on others. Those activities can drive to profound extremes.
As the play records the shift of society from its gloomy and primitive backgrounds to its new civilized and lightened condition, it is normal that the idea of light and dark have to befall during the course of the play. The authors of The Oresteia, Oedipus Tyrranus, and Grimms' Tales provided the audience with the concepts of justice and vengeance. As these stories unfold, the difference between the two is demonstrated through the fate of the characters. Pursuing a terrible quest for revenge evidently fosters blindness or madness. One can be unreasonable because of the intense drive of vengeance. People should be aware of the difference between acquiring revenge or justice. The right justice delivers that gratification in a method which conveys the problem to an end. Revenge invites retaliation from the other part and most probably cannot be controlled by the bounds which are essential in regulation and justice.