Free Report On Food Safety Codes Of Practice

Section one

The food industry is sensitive and requires strict regulatory bodies to ensure that consumers get products that are safe for them. The need to ensure that all food products and production sites are clean and healthy has called for different regulatory bodies to work harder to ensure that the process of food production and distribution are safe more than ever. The effect of mismanaged hazards in the food industry is highly disastrous resulting in illnesses, deaths and in most cases malnutrition. The role of this bodies include developing policies and regulations to guide the different stakeholders in the food industry using guidelines that will ensure food safety (BRC Global standards, 2015 p. 23). Some of these bodies include ISO and BRC Global Standard for Food Safety Issue. These bodies work tirelessly to ensure the safety and good health of consumers in different parts of the world especially member countries. These bodies have their similarities and differences in how they plan and implement some of their policies and regulations.

BRC 6

The BRC global standard for food safety Issue 6 is internationally recognised as being at forefront for food safety. The BRC 6 is published in 1998. So, the global standard Issue 6 (BRC 6) provides a framework for food manufactures to help the production of safe food and manage product quality to meet customer, requirements. Certification to BRC 6 ensures that food businesses are compliant with food safety legislation.BRC 6 Global standard requirements divided into seven sections include; Senior Management Commitment, The Food Safety Plan – HACCP and Food Safety and quality management system. The other requirements are Site Standards, Product Control, Process Control and Personnel. All these aspects of the BRC6 work interact to ensure maximum implementation of food safety issues that minimizes risks that can occur during the different stages of food production and distribution.

ISO 22000

ISO2200 is an auditable food safety standard, published in 2005 by the international organization for standard. Therefore, ISO 22000 specifies the requirement for food security as well as it safety management system that comprises of the following elements; Interactive Communication that stipulates that there is a need for constant exchange of information along the food chain is paramount for ensuring that all interlinked food safety issues are identified and proper control measures implemented at different stages within the food chain. The other requirement is System management where effective food systems require a uniquely designed management practice and integrated into the organization management. This supplies advantage for organization and other stakeholders in the different food chains. ISO 22000 has aligned with the ISO9001 that focuses on the Quality Management System in order to increase the adaptability both standards. ISO22000 is applicable independently of different existent management standards. The other aspect of ISO is Pre-requisite Programmes. The standard requires prerequisite programmes (PRPs) to be put in place and concerted with a HACCP plan to ensure that they are comprehensive food safety management system.
The other requirement of ISO is to work according to the HACCP Principles. The HACCP system should be operated effectively. During hazard analysis the organization identified the strategy to be used to ensure hazard control by combining the prerequisite programmes and HACCP Plan. ISO works hard to ensure that different stakeholders comply with the guidelines and safety regulations in the food industry. Thereby, it is with collaboration between it and the different organization in the regulatory business that maximizes security in the food sector.

Primus GSM

Primus GSM is an Australian telecommunication schedule provider and was published in 2011. It is concerned with service provision and is an agreement between the mobile service customers. It focuses on ensuring that the consumers in different parts of Australia who do not have access to mobile services are working within areas with coverage. The standards cover some of the requirements that are there between the organization as well as its customers. Some of its area of focus include ensuring consumers have genuine SIM cards to ensure validity in their operation and to ensure they are part of the Primus network. The organization also works to give their customers a chance to demand warranties for different products purchased as evident in (4.2.3, 4.3). It however, does not take blame for some of the frauds that occur but can work with the clients to minimize cases of fraud that can be rampant in some parts of the country.

Compare and contrast table

Section two
Primus GMS standard can qualify to be on the GFSI (6th Ed) as it has a high potential of meeting all the requirements of the certification process. In order for a standard to be certified by the GFSI, there is need for it to pass the audit performed by third party bid against other schemes that are listed and are under the recognition of the GFS. Therefore, if for example, it is audited by the Coca Cola Company which is certified and recognized by GFSI, and it passes the audit, then it stands a huge chance of being certified. These third party audit companies are referred to as Certification Bodies (CBs) and if they approve of Primus after passing its audit, then there is chance that it might join the accredited list. However, it is clear that the main scope of GFSI, is on the food industry, yet Primus is a tele-communication stands body. Therefore, this possess a huge problem to its accreditation and certification by the GSFI, therefore, I do not believe that it can actually meet the retirements as well as fit into the category of companies under the body (Jolley, 2003 p. 52).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the need for food safety in the different food chains across the world is paramount. Therefore, it is important that the existing regulatory bodies work continuously to ensure that the food industry is always safe. The ISO and BRC Global Standard for Food Safety work tirelessly in collaboration with other stakeholders in the industry to ensure that safety is upheld at all times. The two bodies have the same goals and objectives; to ensure safety in the food industry by minimizing and eliminating all risks that may lead to illnesses, deaths and increase malnutrition among the consumers. It is evident that the combined efforts of these two bodies are increasing the intensity in the fight to uphold safety in different food chains across the world. The two bodies, however, have their difference in their approach to safety issues. The focus of each differ with each organization as one focuses on what should be done before and in the management aspect while the other one focuses on auditing some of the food industries across the globe. The important factor is that both organizations involve other stakeholders in the technical formulation of the policies and regulations.

References

British Standard, 2005, Food safety management systems —Requirements for any organization in the food chain, p. 1-46
BRC Global standards, 2015, BRC Global Standard for Food Safety Issue.British retail consortium. (7), 1- 124.
Jolley, W, 2003, When the Tide Comes In: Towards Accessible Telecommunications for People with Disabilities in Australia,Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.