Good Example Of Essay On The Summary Of “Philosophical Investigations”
The language is a method of identifying objects, persons and places those collectively dwell around us, and create our world. The world in turn works meticulously to sustain the human race. However, the element of culture, history and relevant worldviews of each society plays a powerful hand in terms of create a collection of psychological outlooks that the materialistic entities represents, and the culture changes the meaning of language to such an extent that an evil in one culture can develop a representation of a nobility in the other so the societal variables have to receive proper weight before one can effectively understand the language that people of specific geographical use in order to communicate with each other (Wittgenstein, Hacker and Schulte, 258), and the theory of social constructionism argues that people and managers create the climate of the organization all by themselves, and therefore, the personalities of managers will have a stronger influence on how the company will operate.
At a larger canvas, one can establish that the language does not have or carry isolative meanings, and the method of delivery, cultural setting, and worldviews of both conversing parties have to lend a helping limb in order to give a specific meaning to the talk. The developed parts of the world hold the concept of human effort dearly, and the developing ones have an ability to be superstitious on more than one occasion, and the language is a tool of planning actions those will produce economic and social benefits for the entire society. However, the unpractical thinking patterns of not so advanced countries has actively kept them from achieving substantial growth in terms of sociological and fiscal constructs, and the notions people have in abovementioned geographical locations have kept them from achieving national growth. The cultural context of the language gives it a specific meaning, and therefore, lingual messages do not carry same background information in different settings. The private language’s incapability to have specific and absolute meanings originates from the surrounding cultural realities.
The language is a method of communication that facilitates the transfer of information, emotions, and beliefs from one party to another, and the negative feelings do not have to perpetuate because the trend will contaminate the socialistic environment of the society, and therefore, people will lose faith in the power that human effort holds regarding the ability to create or destroy destinies of the nations, and the belief that evil will not be enough to fight the strength of good, and therefore, nobility will emerge as a victorious contestant.
The language is going to create mental motivational energy in the minds of the people to develop action oriented personality spaces those will create social ripples those will be institutionalized in due time and the certain type of culture will manifest eventually. The people become goats, and they will follow the crowd, and the suppressed factions of the society will raise voice in order to change the overall mindset of the community because there are ethical and socialistic diseases are propagating in the masses.
The process of human development is seeded in one’s power to post his or her effort in practical terms, and therefore, something negative or positive will transpire, and the society will ethicize its behavior towards issues those are confronting the lower communal levels, and conclusively, this paper can establish the fact that the language is a source of energy that sends people into different professions where they input their motivations in order to create industrial and professional results. Due to cultural and social differences, one cannot assign same meaning to similar words and phrases, and that is the major cause of private language’s failure to carry specific and unchangeable meanings.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Peter M S Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Philosophical Investigations . New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. Online.