Marx, The German Ideology Article Review Samples
Type of paper: Article Review
Topic: Communism, Property, Business, Commerce, People, Leadership, Ownership, Wellness
In the current world, people react differently to both communism and capitalism. However, each system has its pros and cons. For instance, communism encourages equal distribution of wealth but can also increase the laziness due to the sharing. On the other hand, capitalism leads to unequal distribution of resources, but it leads to an upsurge in the economic growth.
According to Marx, nations and individuals usually form groupings on the basis of the production forces. On the other hand, the production forces depend on the population because with an increase in the population, people develop and invent new ways to support and feed the population. As a result, the division of labor comes in, and the nations after that establish relations that could help them borrow production tips from the neighbors. Therefore, the member countries always alienate from the fewer developed countries due to lack of the production factors and methods. In most cases, the relations established among nations depend on the mutual dependence from each thereby locking out those without the factors.
Consequently, the division of labor leads to different forms of property ownership. For this reason, the ownership of the premises outlines the relationships among the community members and the development of the communities. In most cases, the rich always associate with the rich due to their social, political and economic abilities thereby building the relations of the material things. Some argue that the same social class people always relate well due to their sharing of many similarities thereby making and implementing their developmental plans, leaving behind the poor people. As a result, the premises of the materialist method bring in a wide gap between the rich and poor due to property ownership. It also leads to unequal distribution of wealth, where the rich continue growing rich, and the poor remain poor.
Nevertheless, the ownership of private property could have some elements of communism. For instance, partnerships or cooperatives who jointly own property promote communism. The members share profits or losses generated from the property based on the contributions of an individual. Additionally, the managements also assign the members with different tasks that match their skills to help in generation of more revenue. For this reason, provide property embraces the division of labor, which demarcates one territory. On the other hand, communism discourages the division of labor and it increases the degree of flexibility among the citizenry because the society does not assign a specific task to the individuals.
Consequently, the private ownership of property leads to political instabilities as the societies elect leaders on the basis of the property one owns. On the other hand, some people prefer communism because, during the elections, no one uses his property ownership or financial gains to woo people to voting. For this reason, communism gives rise to a democratic government because communism requires the leaders to share the wealth acquired from the leadership among the community members. The mutual interdependence communism demand leads to cooperation among the individuals thereby promoting a peaceful coexistence in the nation.
In conclusion, many countries should embrace communism because it harmonizes people thereby bridging the gap between the rich and the poor brought by the private property of ownership. Nevertheless, the citizenry should also work together to promote communism due to its fewer conflicts. The individuals need one another for development, therefore, the need for communism to enhance the relationships among people without the discrimination.