Risk Assessment Critical Thinking
Type of paper: Critical Thinking
Topic: Law, Risk, Security, Bullying, Threat, Terrorism, Organization, Violence
It is important to allocate the right resource to sectors in the economy with regards to security to ensure that the nation is safe. Additionally the government has to ensure that it uses technological advanced equipment because even the terrorists have been known to use technology in their attacks (Kidwell, 2004). It is also important for the government to make sure all sections of the security are not under threat because if one section fails to perform properly then all other section will stop to function. The reason for this is because all sections of the security system are connected. The country’s major external threat is terrorism attacks (Kidwell, 2004).
Numerous security risk assessors consider security risks in the form of Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Consequences (TVC) (Kidwell, 2004). Unequivocally considering each of the TVC elements is important for the country security threats, for example, those identified with the safety of economic sectors.
On the other hand, considering TVC is sometimes not the best approach to assess the risks of the country, particularly those that incorporate institutional dangers that can affect a company's capacity to meet operational and authoritative necessities. Actually, a standout amongst the most widely recognized pitfalls in country security risk assessment is using the TVC system incorrectly (Kidwell, 2004). It is vital that the TVC system be used when need arises in the topic of the examination and the character of the surveyed threats. Moreover, experts ought to be extremely keen when ascertaining risks by reproducing threats, vulnerabilities, and outcomes, particularly for terrorism, because the link between the three factors, and miscalculation, can prompt gravies consequences. It is vital to consider what can be undermined and what must be secured by state and local law implementation organizations and their partners who give security in the private sector (Kidwell, 2004)
The intelligent method is the establishment of risk appraisal. Precise misuse of crime related data can prompt assessment and examination of terrorism. Information on the terrorist, venue, the plan, where they intended to attack and the time of attack are all related. Insight endeavors help produces solid, answers to these inquiries. Without such a procedure, risk evaluations can be unusual and difficult to accomplish (Leson, 2003).
Threat appraisals must be gathered from complete and thorough exploration and examination. Law implementation cannot work singularly. Threat appraisals that do not fuse the intelligence, evaluations, and comprehension of state, associations with the potential dangers being evaluated are inalienably deficient (Leson, 2003).
Vulnerability is hard to gauge without being bias. Advancement is being made by organizations, “for example, the National Institute of Justice in association with the U.S. Branch of Energy's Sandia National Laboratories, and in addition by studies directed by the National Infrastructure Protection Center of DHS, to help with these evaluations, “(Leson, 2003).
Components to consider when deciding vulnerability include: Area of potential threat towards people, organizations. What is the distance between the threated people or organization from the threat? Can the terrorists (for example) gain access to the facility and operate their attack? Is it easy for them to run away from the law enforcers? Are the law enforcers able to respond fast? (Leson,2003).
A fundamental piece of the risk function is considering the outcome of t (Leson, 2003)he loss of or the actual harm to essential economic sectors, frameworks, and different resources . The measure of criticality or resource decides a definitive significance of the assets. Death toll and harm to key resources are of vital concern to law officials. Loss of targets, which can be seen in the media and that is what terrorists look for, is additionally vital; it can harm individuals' confidence in the capacity of law requirement and government to secure its people in general (Leson, 2003).
Evaluating criticality can often include some level of subjectivity. Appraisals may depend on the close intelligent of law enforcement organization experts and their associates in other government organizations to gage the significance of every potential target. In any case, clear target idea must prosper when loss of human life is conceivable. Certain sectors are naturally vulnerable and ought to be tended to as basic sectors or key resources by law authorization (Leson, 2003).
People in general and the security agencies always advocate that the DHS correspond with outer partners, accomplices, and the general population. Risk administration decisions ought to be conveyed to the general population when suitable to minimize fear while building confidence. Likewise, different types of government and the general population and the private segment regularly have an imperative part to play in diminishing security risks and are subsequently a vital piece of the risk administration process. When imparting to external agencies, it is fundamental that changing threat trends and learning of risks be considered. Those outside the law enforcement system can have an alternate point of view in regards to dangers than those inside the Department, just as leaders and organization heads have alternate points of view from one another. Such contrasts imply that the communication ought to be precisely customized to satisfy what the public wants but at the same time the security of the country should grow stronger.
Kidwell, R. (2004). Risk Management Fundamentals. Postgraduate Obstetrics & Gynecology, 24(20), 1-4. doi:10.1097/00256406-200410150-00001
Leson, J. (2003). Assessing and Managing Terrorism Threat. National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Retrieved 13 March 2015, from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/210680.pdf