The Tax Payer Relief Act Essay Examples

Taxes play a significant role in funding the government programs, but the same time taxes are a significant burden on the taxpayers. The property of the taxes gives an account of a large proportion of the revenue for the government across the country. In my opinion, I think Pennsylvania is not different from other countries. In 2000, the proper taxes in Pennsylvania were 30% of the local government revenues and 70% of the local government tax revenues. I have also realized that Pennsylvania is spending a significant amount of money in education. I believe this is true because Pennsylvania is spends a lot of money per student compared to the national average. Education is important to the country, but I believe the Pennsylvania must do something to reduce the percentage it is spending on education.
The high spending by the local government implies an additional burden to the taxpayers. This is the reasons why the legislators tried to harmonize the spending. The legislators implemented Act 1, which finally gave the residents an advantage of taking control over their school spending. From my side the legislators did a critical analysis when implementing Act 1. I think the reason why the Act harmonized the amount of money spent on the education was due to the fact that the it gave rise to homestead exclusion that became a theme in the efforts for tax reforms. This was the best approach that the legislators used to harmonize the cost of education that was a burden to the community. It is however, surprising if the people of Pennsylvania were concerned with the increasing tax burden, why is it that only a handful of schools have been enacted by the law? It is questionable whether the school district rejects the property tax reduction allocation. Although the proponents have a chance to control their spending on schools, they are not paying much attention. To know if this Act 1 is effective in reducing the amount of money spent on education by implementing Act 1 in every school in Pennyslavia.
Additionally, the use of the voting as a way of approving the Act is an excellent way of determining whether the Act s reliable or not reliable. It is also the best way of determining the confidence that people have in the Act (Taxpayer Relief Act1, 2014). It is true that the concern of harmonizing the money spent on schools was because the burden of tax was too much for the residents of Pennsylvania. However, it is stated that the Pennsylvania schools have fared poorly compared to the schools in other states in terms of education. It may be a decision of minimizing the amount spent on education, but the fact that schools were fared poorly, I believe it could have been better if the tax relief was based on the sector in Pennsylvania. I also like the proposal by Rendell on increasing the state sales and using the revenue to reduce the taxes on property. The increase in sales to reduce the property taxes will not affect the important sectors in the Pennsylvania as a country. From the tax relief in Pennsylvania, it is important that Pennsylvania took a step to reduce the burden from the taxpayers. However, Pennsylvania still has a lot to do to deal with this problem so that the property taxes are lowered more.
Improvements are intended to ensure that there are viable tax payment options and a reduction of tax burden on the taxpayer. Pennsylvania’s intentions to improve the education of education who not be alienated along recurrent expenditures because intensive spending will slow the level of development in other areas that contribute to the development of the state. The state should reduce the recurrent expenditure and increase the fixed expenditures, which will increase the number of schools in the state as well as advanced institutions of higher learning. Failure to improve other areas affecting the state such as industries will reduce the rate of employment within the country, which will nullify the essence of increased resource allocation on education. The state should also engage in benchmarking approaches so that it can understand various aspects that would be stepped up to promote the education sector within the state.
The effectiveness of the act should be aligned to the level of returns within the state to prevent the taxpayers from financial strains. Attempts to promote the viability of major projects within the country should be to ensure that the rate of development is in line with the living standards within the state. The current taxation policies are obviously flawed because there are not significant positive returns from the investments committed to providing the necessary amenities to the state (Taxpayer Relief Act1, 2014). Proper inclination of development projects should be aimed to ensure that the country yields the necessary benefits that will place the country’s general performance in a higher level.
The current law stipulates that the school board can only adjust the property tax to the levels indicated by the act, unless adjustments are made corresponding to the given state laws. The law is aimed to ensure that there is a financial balance between the upper and lower class of people within the country. Off course, taxation is a sure approach of reducing the taxes incurred in the financial development within the state, but again viable strategies will most importantly place the organization in a better position to advance the living standards of the people.
Regulations of school spending by the public have a detrimental effect because it could interfere with the budgeting approaches of the district schools. A conflict between the budget of the school and the decision of the voters could significantly interfere with the learning process. Schooling aspects must be regulated by professional strategies rather than political because they prevent the level of interference of schooling operations with other normal operations in the country. Taxation regulation measures could also raise to constant wrangles within the curriculum execution process (Taxpayer Relief Act1, 2014). The initial intentions of the voters to decide on the budget allocation to the organization has been constantly limited by the changing political tides.
The level of creativity of the act has made a significant impact on the dynamics of spending within Pennsylvania because schools have been mandated with the authority to reduce the amount of taxes committed education. Proper guidelines will require to put in place to ensure that the desire to manage and improve gaming revenues do not interfere with the academic advancement. The state has an obligation to step up on its audits on the current process involved in the regulation of curricular and co-curricular activities within the state.

References

Taxpayer Relief Act1. “Pennsylvania Legislator’s Municipal Deskbook” Fourth Edition (2014)