Group Dynamism Final Paper Outline And References Essay Samples

I. Introduction
Current Problem: Poor communication and weak personality skills factors alongside extrinsic values and gender imbalances in a team excessively undermines the effectiveness and success of a team in executing a task or project.
Thesis Statement: Communication and personality skills factors, alongside gender and intrinsic values are critical to the effectiveness and success of a team, specifically in the levels of communication, satisfaction, compatibility, and confidence.
Keywords: Group Dynamics; Consensus; Team programming; Interpersonal communication; Groupthink; Teams.
II. Background
A. Cognitive Performance Review: Certain personality or cognitive type performs better than other types in different phases (Dörnyei, & Murphey, 2004).
B. Decision Quality Variation Review: Deviations in different cognitive styles of a group impact on business decision quality (Cheng, Luckett & Schulz, 2003).
C. Gender Grouping Review: Similar gender grouped together would possibly result in a well-matched pair in a team while mingling gender would less likely lead to compatibility (Thomas, Ratcliffe & Robertson, 2003).
D. Gaps in Research: Little information is available exploring group dynamic behaviors against group performance and its implication on the effectiveness of a team work.
III. Results

A. Major Point 1: Main causes of poor group dynamics

a Minor Points: Weak leadership, blocking, excessive deference to authority, the negator, the aggressor, the withdrawer, the joker and the recognition seeker, free riding, group thinking, evaluation apprehension

B. Major Point 2: Strategies and methods that are improving team dynamics

a Minor Points: Quick problem tackling, knowing your team, roles and responsibilities definition, through a feedback mechanism, barrier breakdown, creation of a team charter, communication, team building, and paying attention.
C. Major Point 3: Impact of developing motivation and commitment (Expectancy theory)
a. Minor Points: Regularly define expectation, make work doable and valuable, provide feedback, and reward successful performance.
D. Major Point 4: Methods of developing a positive team dynamics
a. Minor Points: Communicating styles, Interpersonal styles, Background and styles, and Personal work style.

E. Major Point 4: Adhering to developed team values and norms

a. Minor Point 1: Methods of identifying team values and norms
i. Minor Points 1.1: Team to proposes a list, thorough discussion of proposed norms together with their effects, and identify and deploy the agreed norms
ii. Minor Points 1.2: Gaining members commitment on the norms

F. Major Point 5: Developing successful team

a. Minor Point 1: Components used in successful team development and building
i. Minor point 1.1: Mission establishment, leadership and team design, guidelines and team rules, team dynamics, team controls, and team evaluation.

G. Personality Factor Implication: Impact of personality factor on group communication, satisfaction, compatibility and confidence

H. Gender Factor implication: Gender has significant implication levels in areas of satisfaction, communication, and compatibility but with no impact whatsoever on group productivity.
I. Conclusion
J. Restatement of Thesis: Effective communication and strong personality skills factors, including gender balance and intrinsic values are critical to a successful team work, specifically in the levels of communication, satisfaction, compatibility, and confidence.
K. It is implied that a team’s unity may be raised if the similar gender is used. Nevertheless, a team with similar gender did not show a same level of confidence perception on the end product. We conclude that allowing the similar gender to make up a team would result in a higher satisfaction, communication, and compatibility if only the end product isn’t a concern.

References

Dörnyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2004). Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Franz, T. M. (2012). Group dynamics and team interventions: Understanding and improving team performance. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
Forsyth, D. R. (2010). Group dynamics. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.