Free Essays on Guilt to Get Inspired & Learn by Example

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating mental condition after experiencing (or witnessing) a mentally scarring event or ordeal. It is developed after a terrifying ordeal that involved either physical harm or the threat of receiving physical harm (Galovski & Lyons, 2003). People suffering from this condition are often troubled by flashbacks. The symptoms for this mental disorder include re-experiencing the traumatic event, emotional numbing, avoidance and hyper arousal. PTSD makes it difficult for people to live a normal life because it makes them anxious and thus affect their behaviors. PTSD is also marked with biological changes that accompany Continue reading...

By definition, abortion refers to a deliberate termination of a pregnancy. Even so, the act is done to end an unwanted or unplanned pregnancy. There are safe and unsafe abortions with the former consisting of in-clinic practices performed by a qualified physician or nurse (Grimes and Brandon 32). In this case, the practitioner either safely removes the pregnancy using medical instruments and gentle suction or uses medication. In medication abortion, the women take pills that make her uterus expel the gestation tissue and end the pregnancy. On the other hand, an unsafe abortion refers to the ending of a pregnancy by an unqualified individual or in an environment that is not up to the required medical standards. Use of high-dose medication, insertion of a sharp object into the womb, flushing the uterus with harmful liquids, and physical abuse are all forms of unsafe abortions (Grimes and Brandon 31). Women, who go for unsafe abortions are often ignorant of the adverse consequences to which they expose themselves. Whether safe or unsafe, abortion has noteworthy negative effects, particularly on the psychological, physiological, and economic fronts.

Continue reading...

The right to silence, also known as the privilege against self-incrimination refers to two distinct but deeply related liberties. The privilege against self-incrimination concerns the general principle of English law that a person is innocent until proven guilty and that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove their case against any person they suspect of committing a crime. Accordingly, the suspect has no obligation to voluntarily provide the prosecution with evidence that will or might be self-incriminating or assist in their prosecution. The right to silence, on the other hand, not only allows a person to refuse Continue reading...

Post No. 1

There are some points in this post that I cannot agree with. First, I agree that at present the US operates more under a crime control model of the criminal justice system. This observation can be justified by statistics showing plea bargained convictions constituting more than 90% of total convictions on both the state and federal levels (Durose and Langan 2007; (DOJ 2014). Even Haley and Bohm (2014) pointed out the fluctuation in models that change with changes in political regimes. I do not agree, however, that the crime control model is the better option. Swiftness is ideal, but Continue reading...

model? Or both? Justify your answer. Which model should we be under? Justify
I think that the country’s present criminal justice system can be characterized as one overlapping the crime control model and due process model with a tendency to lean towards the former. According to the BJS, 95% of felony convictions in state courts in 2004 resulted from guilty pleas (Durose and Langan 2007). On the other hand, federal data showed that 97% of convictions in federal courts resulted from guilty pleas (DOJ 2014). Haley and Bohm (2014) suggested that plea bargaining is one of the hallmarks Continue reading...