Conflict Resolution And Peacemaking Essay Sample

Handelman (2012) observes conflict in the Arab world that separates secular nationalists and religious fanatics to tear apart the Palestine. Palestine has geographical and political divisions. The Hamas entails a radical Islamist movement that controls the strip of Gaza while the secular movement called Fatah administers the West Bank.
The United Nations that attempts to bring conflict resolution observes that each leader has an own political and ideology from the other. The Hamas along the Gaza strip has the commitment of establishing an Islamic dictatorship that will precipitate a war not in favor of Israel. Fatah at West Bank intends to build a communal society and reach a diplomatic declaration with Israel. The divide in the Palestine civilization lingers a two-state explanation amidst nervous state of affairs on the argument. United Nations, as well as other arbitrators, struggle on how to arrive at a consensus solution. State actors implemented a two-state clarification in Bengal area so that they could reduce tensions between Muslims and Hindus. The cause of disagreement is that Bengal region had two zones one belonging to Indians and the other Pakistanis. The tensions between the two regions led to a civil war in 1971 that failed i8n having a two-state resolution.
Handelman (2012) does not intend to check on the viability of two state solutions to resolve the conflict between Gaza and West Bank. The conflict situation in Bengal and the divide in Palestinian culture is a demonstration that there should be a change in the conventional debate that concerns the Israeli-Palestine state of affairs. The author claims that the situations need an effective peacemaking process that will assist the warring states discovers a road to peace and stability. The strife in the Palestine Society proposes that the campaigning of amicable resolution in the region will demand a twofold stratagem that includes divergence management and conflict resolution.
Conflict management will reduce the intensity of the continual violent struggle that will set up incremental thread to create the fresh communal order. Conflict resolution has the device to put up the underpinning of a successful pacifying course one established through concession on numerous stages. The Israeli-Palestinian peace process is either a sign of hope or desperation o9f Gaza and West Bank. After having more than 30 years of direct and indirect diplomatic connections, it remains one of the entrenched tensions in the world. Conflict resolution and conflict management techniques established in the tensions have left disappointing outcomes of infinite negotiations and endless peacemaking inventions. Some scholars studying the conflict did not have a lasting solution to end the strife for the last time. Unfruitful efforts in the peace process to ensure tranquillity and steadiness in the region result in a archetype budge in the approach to deal with a near irretrievable issue. Researchers consider the benefit of developing conflict management tactics other than employing futile efforts to resolve it.
Handelman (2012) provides a divergence organization approach and variance declaration policy. Originators of argument administration come within reach of cite that it is impossible to resolve the conflict in the near future. Analysts in the conflict management approach provide policy recommendations to improve domestic and foreign position for every society to improve the domestic and foreign position that will reduce the intensity. That approach will hopefully translate negotiations that will lead to a peaceful agreement in the future. Those that support a conflict resolution state that if state actors would return to the negotiating table they will eventually find a lasting solution. The disintegration of Palestinian government in 2000s and opinionated partition flanked by West Bank together with Gaza lead to the Israelis lose hope in terms such as peace process and conflict resolution.
Ariel Sharon a supporter of conflict resolution strategy thought of negotiation, cooperation, and coordination between Israelis and Palestine while his withdrawal led to frustration and despondency among the nationalists. The backers of divergence decision tactic assert to facilitate interface stuck between the two states on numerous echelons are crucial since they have a lasting solution. The elements are critical that could avert weakening of the stillness progression, escalate the brutality, and progress to a motion to the variance. In addition to that, supporters of a conflict resolution strategy believe that the lack of extensive negotiations would deepen the people’s frustration and strengthen the conviction of the impossibility of resolving the conflict using peaceful means. The environment created called a mirror image is ideal for extremists and radicals that dictate the conditions for the society.
The two competing solutions of conflict management approach and conflict resolution strategy are persuasive in nature while there is a hardship to envision how to recover the liaison between the warring parties while there is no universal position for conciliation at the moment in time . An all-embracing assuaging effort is likely to create an environment for change.
Some scholars believe that conflict resolution strategies are the best technique to resolve the conflict while those of the contrary opinion believe that conflict management approach is better since it will reduce the level of intense conflict.
Handelman (2012) believes that a revolutionary peacemaking process will maneuver on opposing the side of the divide so that they will discover a road to stability, tranquility, and prosperity. The main feature to unravel heated discussion between the divergent people entails discreet dealings connecting principals. The significant appliance to condense pressure includes discussions and public debate. A world-shattering assuaging progression will provide biased substitute to the vicious fight.

References

Fitzduff, M. (2008). Review of Paving the way: Contributions of interactive conflict resolution to peacemaking. Political Psychology, 29(6), 948-951.
Handelman, S. (2012). Between the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and the East–West Pakistan struggle: a challenge to the conventional wisdom. Israel Affairs, 18(1), 12-32.