Good Example Of What Does John Murrin Mean By "Anglicization," And How Was The Revolution "The Culminating Moment In The Process Of Anglicization"?  Essay

As a term in the American History, this was a mode or an idea that explains the unification of all the colonies of Britain in the American Continent. Theoretically, it means that the British colonies are undergoing a process from which they have come from different beginnings and has become more alike to each other basing on their political, religious and economies that would eventually lead them to seek independence from the empire.
Anglicization relies on two capable incongruities: first and foremost, that the thirteen territory settlements had never been more British than ever on the night of their Independence War from Britain; and, second, that this imparted Britishness, as opposed to a feeling of American peculiarity, empowered those provinces to make basic cause in the Revolution and the production of the early Republic. The revolution was called the culmination because it has untied the 13 provinces and has made a firm decision to get its freedom from the empire. Additionally, they have completed the process of Anglicization. They are sharing British mindsets however their unity has made them realize the process of gaining freedom.

Personal Reaction Murrin

I partially agree to his statement. However the process went through a lot of mischief. Evidently the provinces did not agree to each other. They are very autonomous with each other. Yes, the inevitable part is that they are more likely developing into a society that shares the same tradition, political systems and many aspects of civilization. The Anglicization is inevitable on that context. Surely, it made the triumph of the now known “America” against the British Empire. If it had not because of cooperation of the provinces then there would be no United States today.