Free Essays on Reasoning to Get Inspired & Learn by Example

Introduction

The analysis of judge activity can help answer critical questions regarding legal interpretations of judges and whether they follow a set of pre-existing standards or they only rely on different available techniques to reach their ultimate judgments. It is the judge responsibility to have the power that enables him to take the best decision in each cases handled to him. Such power is linked to the typical coercion of law. Juridical interpretation explains how the judge interprets legislations and laws in order to support the judge law-making role. Judges interpret and assess the available evidences presented to them while Continue reading...

Introduction

“Cogito ergo sum” is one of Descartes famous philosophical ideas, utilized for arguing the humans’ sense of reasoning. Implicitly, the theory also claims that only humans are capable of reasoning, because reasoning describes their existence, and not that of other beings. In other words, only humans are gifted with the quality of thinking rationally, while the animals, birds, insects or any other form of living organism is not capable of reasoning. The main objection to this argument is that reasoning is a characteristic that defines not only humans, but also other living organisms, which possess the ability to think, Continue reading...

Inductive reasoning as opposed to deductive logic, refers to the concept that implies that the general conclusion is not certain but probable and can be derived from the specific instances. In other words, induction is movement from the details towards the generalized picture that depends on these details while deduction is movement in opposite direction – from the general and certain conclusion towards the details that prove this conclusion. The philosophical approach to inductive reasoning is more complex than just the simple progression from specific instances to generalization. Inductive argument rather indicates some degree of support for the possible conclusion Continue reading...

The reasoning pathway that the two crew members have taken was largely based on the clinical signs and symptoms that Sam exhibited the past few days and the moment that they arrived to address the situation. Some of the most pertinent and clinically relevant findings in this case were the fact that the patient has to regularly take Ventolin just so he can have comfort; plus the fact that Ventolin intake presents only with limited success. Ventolin, for the record, is a commonly used inhalant by patients who have asthma or any other airway obstruction-related diseases. This information alone, Continue reading...

Moral reasoning is a rational process which determines if a thought or an idea is correct or incorrect. To understand if something is correct or incorrect, a person must initially understand what that something is, and what it is supposed to do. Moral behavior is different from moral reasoning as it is the variation of objectives, judgments, and activities between those that are good or correct with those that are bad or incorrect. Moral reasoning can be considered as one of the possible ways to arrive at moral behavior. People at high moral reasoning stages are known to act Continue reading...

As a science student, one is often expected to have quantitative and logical reasoning, while addressing issues or problems in work. Shavelson, in his book “Statistical Reasoning for Behavioral Sciences” says that quantitative reasoning is a component of the ‘assessment triangle’. Each of the three vertices of the triangle being: observation, quantitative reasoning and inference respectively. Documentation has been an important part of my work, and quantitative and logical reasoning is needed to communicate effectively through these documents. To have this quantitative approach it is necessary to have a sound working knowledge of statistics and mathematics.
Statistic will prove Continue reading...

According to Griffith (1998), there is no hope of doing perfect research. Griffith’s (1998) statement is correct because the body of knowledge used as a reference in reasoning and analyzing phenomena is constantly changing. It is also agreeable that an individual’s knowledge and skills changes over time. The reason for this is that there are always loopholes in existing theories that need refinement, improvement, and the addition of knowledge. It is, for this reason, important, to identify areas where an existing theory needs improvement in order to improve the theories. Similarly, it is of great significance for Continue reading...

Faith and reason are considered to be the sources of authority on which one can rest his beliefs. The reason could be defined as the principles for a methodological investigation that could be intellectual, moral or religious. Reasoning does not follow the experiences gained from traditions or higher authorities. On the other hand, faith, involves claims that cannot be explained through reasoning. Faith requires a complete trust from an individual. Believer of faith act on the will of authority that usually comes from the superior source such as the revelation that could be direct or indirect such as testimony Continue reading...

INTRODUCTION

Religion has always remained central to America's sense of mission both abroad and at home and to the national narrative. This observation can be transposed onto various geographical contexts despite the salient belief that religion and modernity are antithetical entities and belief systems (). The intersectionality of religion, law, and justice is nuanced and complex, especially within the context of modernity an in an increasingly globalized world. Indeed, the relationship between religion and law have profound implications for political, social, and legal issues that pertain to constitutional rights to the freedom of belief and religion as well as the nexus Continue reading...

Philosophy Final Project:

Summary:
Orion Magazine is a magazine with the motto, “Nature. Culture. Place.” This ethos is evident through much of the articles that are published, and this is again true of Derrick Jensen’s article, “Forget Shorter Showers.” In the article, Jensen takes a hard line approach against perceived “environmentalism.” His basic premise argues against making individual change and environmental living a political act because it doesn’t affect change. However, within the article he does into much deeper detail forming many important and effective arguments. The main conclusion he makes is that personal change is not enough; instead, we Continue reading...