Good Critical Analysis Essay Example

A Call to Improve Campus Accessibility for the Mobility Impaired is proposal written by Manasi Deshpande to the University of Texas (UT) based at Austin. The article offers a comprehensive framework for the improvement on accessibility to the campus. Manasi prepared the proposal as part of her orientation into a job as a consultant at the campus where she would work with other officials to help the campus improve its service provision. After analyzing the dynamics of studying on campus, Manasi drafted the complex proposal which includes a set of recommendations and reasonable baselines for the implementation of various accessibility measures. While she provides an emphasis on physical evidence for the consideration of tighter accessibility measures, she insists that information is the Achilles heel to better service provision for any institution worth its salt in the twenty-first century. In the proposal, Manasi seems to be appealing to a larger audience beyond the Texas campus probably the general public. Using anecdotal references plays an important role in persuasive writing. Using the experience of one mobility impaired student Wes Holloway, she attempts to stress the need for improving accessibility both in the physical and the structural sense. This forms her thesis statement that she reinforces with her persuasive tone urging administrators to think of the physically challenged who surely have equal rights to access campus resources as other students.
Manasi is quite effective in her use of rhetorical appeal to her audience. She uses the anecdotes of one mobility impaired student to appeal to her audience’s sense of empathy. In her perfect introductory summary, Manasi argues that Wes Holloway had found it very comfortable and easy to navigate the campus and its resources as a normal student. She puts the audience in the place of Wes Holloway and draws on the concept of physical impairment and its drawbacks. Writers who need to convince their audience of their convictions in something fundamental in the argument often use this strategy to support their proposals. Manasi applies this to the successful effect that her audience is transfixed on the substance of her persuasion with empathy. One of the most significant factors to facilitate successful persuasive work is to use credible and effective sources. If used and cited well, sources can play a big role in reinforcing the writer’s ideas. Convincing the audience is not all about the content of the writer’s ideas but rather how the writer presents the ideas and how they appeal to the audience. This is one area where Manasi seems to click the right buttons by using personal interviews with four individuals some of whom are impaired students to provide an important perspective into the experiences of a student with disabilities in the campus. She also refers to secondary sources online concerning how other institutions have dealt with the issue of accessibility. In the grand scheme of things, Manasi’s proposal has all the six elements of the Toulmin model of argument. It contains a stable claim to the matter with substantial grounds and warrant to the issues. She also provides a backline to the implementation of the measures and a rebuttal to the possible matters of exception as well as qualification to the possible extent of the ideas. The proposal is, therefore, a suitable argument for convincing the administration. Written in the stable ground of personal evidence, the ideas seem to have validity and little if any of the threat of fallacious argument.
After going through the proposal, there is no doubt that the effect it achieves is dramatically convincing. The article persuasion is so effective that the audience is left to pity the physically impaired students in the campus. One of the well covered grounds of the proposals is the fact that resources are often given more consideration than the impact of the limited accessibility the lack of resources causes. And so she persuades her audience to imagine the hardships that impaired students are forced to go through yet disability is no one’s wish. She delves into the issues of rights and reinforces the idea of equality urging the audience to remember that both impaired and normal students can achieve equally higher results in an environment of proper resources. The picture painted by the proposal is clear, and the means are well outlined. Despite the fact that the subject of the proposal is considered one of limited urgency in the priority list of an institution with so many items the proposal serves its purpose of stamping emphasis for consideration quite effectively.